When Do Slow-Paced Books Work? (a discussion of Sorcery of Thorns by Margaret Rogerson)

It was too slow-paced. I was bored. I kept flipping pages to get to the end. These phrases are just some of the common criticisms we hear often regarding books that are either slow-paced or have a stretched out plot. Sometimes, those criticisms are valid. After all, I’ve done my fair share of flipping through books that I felt were taking for-fucking-ever to get to the point like Wicked Saints.

However, I’d like to present my hot take for the day: a slow pace can be fit a book better than a fast one, and it totally depends on the author’s ultimate goals for their audience’s reading experience.

A perfect example is the book I recently finished, Sorcery of Thorns by Margaret Rogerson. At first, I was pretty reluctant to pick up the book because I’d been seeing mixed reviews of it online, but I decided to one day (the day me, JM, Inah, and Miel went to Pride, incidentally!) because a) that cover is gorgeous, and b) it was on sale!

After an interminably loooong time (I mean, clearly – I bought it in June and just finished reading it in November, lol) I finally picked up this book, went very quickly through it, and realized that I actually disagreed with most people’s assessment that the book was boring!

2019-10-28 10.36.00 4.jpg

Purchase this book here.

Your mileage may vary, of course. Not everyone’s going to have the same opinion about a book. But I do think that, in general, we’ve been spoiled by fast-paced, action-packed YA books where everything moves along really quickly. Not that there’s anything wrong with that! Some of my favorite books play out like a movie on the page. But because we’re so used to things being set in motion quickly, we’ve come to expect that same treatment for almost every book we read.

I believe that the slow pace worked just fine for Sorcery of Thorns and added an aspect to the book that would not have been there had the plot gone faster.

If you’ve never read Sorcery of Thorns, allow me to give you a quick summary. In this universe, magic can be channeled by humans if they interact with demonic familiars. Some sorcerers write grimoires into which they imbue their magic, and so grimoires become sentient. The flip-side of that is grimoires, if messed with, can turn into Maleficts, evil, destructive creatures that can decimate entire villages. Because of this, all grimoires are stored in the Great Libraries, where armed wardens make sure that the grimoires don’t turn into Maleficts, or that any Maleficts are quickly destroyed.

Elisabeth Scrivener, an orphan, grows up in the Great Library of Summerhall, wanting to be a warden just like her patron the Director. When Director is murdered by a Malefict, Elisabeth charges into battle and somehow manages to defeat it, but is then deemed the only suspect. She’s sent to the capital to stand trial, and discovers herself in the midst of a plot involving the Great Libraries, demons, and magic. Helping her along the way is the handsome and enigmatic sorcerer Nathaniel, and his demon familiar Silas.

Read on to find out how a slow pace made Sorcery of Thorns a good read.

post divider 1

The book was atmospheric.

One of the scenarios where a slow pace would work if the book was one that could be described as atmospheric. We all know those books – the type that really develop the setting and take the reader there. Although what usually comes to mind when you say ‘atmospheric’ is spooky reads, this is applicable to other kinds of atmospheres as well.

Sorcery of Thorns is very much an atmospheric read, and I appreciate all the time that Margaret Rogerson took to make us really feel what it was like in a magical library. As someone who’s literally never been in a library outside of school because the Philippine public library system is shit and our government doesn’t do anything to make that better I’ve always been utterly fascinated by libraries and their depiction in fiction.

I feel that slow pace worked because it spoke to the care Margaret Rogerson took when crafting her world of magical libraries, sorcerers, and demonic familiarsAnd I personally feel it worked because a world of magical libraries and sentient books needs time and effort to really get across the message to the reader that this is world where knowledge is valuable, but also very dangerous. If the book had gone much faster, I think that that message might have gone completely over the reader’s head, or else not been telegraphed as effectively.

post divider 2

The author needed time to develop characters.

Fantasy can be character-driven. I find that the emphasis on plot being the driving force behind a book’s movement is a very western-centric concept, and does a great disservice to a lot of books that are propelled by characters and their growth rather than events. In the case where a speculative fiction book is indeed character-driven, it really is in the author’s best interests to utilize a slow pace rather than a fast one. Otherwise, how will we become invested in the characters’ development?

I think Sorcery of Thorns is a character-driven story, which is why the slow pace worked for it. None of the events in the book would have happened if Elisabeth Scrivener, the main character, hadn’t been brave, plucky, and determined to do right by the Director who raised her and the library she grew up in. I immensely liked her, and was rooting for her all the way. In order to establish that likability, that need for the reader to be behind the character all the way, an author sometimes needs to take the time to establish who that character is. 

Another character who benefited from this approach is Silas, Nathaniel’s demonic familiar from whom his powers come from. Silas is very much a complicated character. As a demon, he naturally doesn’t think of humans as more than weak bags of meat. But he also deeply cares about Nathaniel, even if he doesn’t want to admit it. And he comes to care for Elisabeth as well. Silas is very much a JARVIS-like figure in this story with a hellish back-story that’s only ever alluded to, and I just adore characters of that trope. You know what I mean? Those characters that are calm and placid and serene right now, but with a past right out of your worst nightmares and the corresponding combat abilities; those characters that are devoted and dedicated to one or two people and only ever whip out the scary powers if those people are threatened? I fucking live for the characters, and I think taking the time to build them and establish who they are and basically just show rather than tell needs time. Sorcery of Thorns achieved that marvelously.

post divider 2

Clues needed to be strategically placed to drive up the stakes.

One of the things that I adored about Sorcery of Thorns is that there’s a bit of a murder mystery element to it. In the process of trying to solve the Director’s murder, Elisabeth, Nathaniel, and Silas stumble upon a plot to summon the darkest of demonic magic using the Great Libraries. Not only do they have to investigate their suspects, they also have to navigate politics and public opinion while doing so.

Margaret Rogerson left the right amount of foreshadowing and clues littered throughout the book that the conclusion was immensely satisfying. Although not all authors need a slow pace in order to establish foreshadowing, some books use it to great effect. It drives up the stakes, keeps you wondering what’s next, and leaves you with this great ‘aha!‘ moment when all the loose ends are tied up neatly and you finally get to see what the villain’s great plot was.

post divider 2

The author needed time to establish relationships.

This last reason for why slow-paced books may work is related to establishing character, and I think this is also one of the reasons why Sorcery of Thorns really just worked for me.

Character interaction doesn’t work or feel as impactful if there’s no emotion behind them. This is illustrated very well in the relationship between Nathaniel and Silas, Nathaniel and Elisabeth, and even in between all three of them. Like I said, this goes hand in hand with establishing character. If the author hadn’t done that, I really wouldn’t have cared what they meant to each other. But now that I know who they are and I can see it clear as day, how they relate to and care for one another is affected as well.

The relationship between Nathaniel and Silas is one of the best platonic relationships in YA that I’ve ever seen. You have this ageless, almost all-powerful being, with a reputation for being ruthless and cruel, and he cares for only one thing in the world: a young boy he’d been protecting since he was twelve years old. Their relationship flies in the face of everything that the universe of the book had previously established about demons and their relationships with their human masters, and watching it in action – as well as getting to know what had happened between the two of them that made Silas so loyal to Nathaniel – was a beautiful journey. And it certainly is a journey that wouldn’t have worked if this book was more fast-paced or plot-driven.

post divider 1

Let’s hear from you!

☕ Have you read Sorcery of Thorns? What did you think?
☕ What do you think of books with a slow pace?
☕ If you like slow-paced books, rec your faves!

If you enjoyed my content, consider buying me a coffee, making a donation to my PayPal, or using my Amazon affiliate link above to purchase this books (at no extra cost to you)!

post signature

18 thoughts on “When Do Slow-Paced Books Work? (a discussion of Sorcery of Thorns by Margaret Rogerson)

  1. Pingback: Monthly Wrap || November 2019 – the words gremlin

  2. Every single thing you’ve said here is a PERFECT explanation of the things that make Sorcery of Thorns so good. I actually thrive on slower books (usually fantasy tbh, since they lend themselves to taking their time, especially when there’s new worlds to be established) because they let you drop so deeply into the setting and characters, and this is just an incredible case of making it work.

    Easily one of my favorite reads this year, and I’m so glad to see I’m not the only one who adored it!!


  3. Love this review! And I definitely agree about how amazing slow-plotted books can be. This quote was amazing: “a slow pace can be fit a book better than a fast one, and it totally depends on the author’s ultimate goals for their audience’s reading experience.” I think people tend to forget that even though two books may both be fantasies, they have different end goals — one may focus more on plot, another on characters, and that’s good! So definitely love this review 💕

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you! I’m so glad you liked the review. I do think very much so that whether a fast or slow pace depends entirely on what the author is trying to achieve and I’m a little sad to see so many people dismissing slow-paced books without considering that.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. i completely agree with this take!!! i havent read this book, but your discussion of how the slow pace elevates it makes me more eager to do so. i honestly think pacing is defined by the type of story you’re trying to tell, which is why trying to associate a fast or slow pace with some objective standard of “good or bad” doesnt work. like try telling a superhero story with a slow pace: it doesn’t work. but when your book is about character development and how the world shapes the story, you can’t expect to rush that either. and anyone who can’t stand to sit through that is uh. not a very appreciative reader

    Liked by 1 person

    • AHHHHHH SHRI!! Honestly you’re one of the people on book twt whose insights mean a lot to me so I’m sooooo glad you liked this post! I hope you’re able to get around to Sorcery of Thorns soon, it wasn’t as high stakes or action-packed as other YA fantasy but I really adored its character- and world-building!


  5. Sorcery of thorns is one of my favorite books of the year, so seeing you break down the elements in it that make it so wonderful was lovely to read… and I completely agree with your assessments that the character and relationship development was remarkable and gave us something very tangible to root for 😍😍😍

    And as someone who has only discovered the beauty of slow paced fantasy novels this year, I love your post.. I have really come to appreciate the enjoyment in a slow and steady paced book that lets the characters breathe and make us feel deeply connected to them ..

    Thank you so much for this post !!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m so glad you liked my review! Honestly, Sorcery of Thorns is such an underrated book! I adore it so much and I’m so unbelievably happy to find someone else who liked it too!

      And yessss slow-paced fantasy novels can sometimes make for a more immersive experience!

      Liked by 1 person

  6. I haven’t read this, but reading your review made me want to read this more!! One thing I’m wondering, was Elizabeth’s last name named after the word processor Scrivener? Lol. Anyway I really enjoyed how you wove discussion and review in together and I think that’s awesome (I might want to try that some day!). Great post!

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Wow I really love this! The points that I really agree with is how atmospheric and character driven books arent going to be the same as contemporary books where the world doesn’t need so much work and the author doesn’t need to transport you there or plot driven books where the plot keeps you flipping the pages. While those books can be amazing ALL of my favorite books have characters that I absolutely loved. Great character development takes a good deal of time. I tend to lean towards 500 page fantasies because by the end I feel like the characters are real. I hate when I get to the climax of a book that was done too quickly and the impact doesn’t even feel like a climax. I havent even read A Sorcery of Thorns, but now I want to because this was such a compelling arguement for why the pacing worked

    Liked by 1 person

    • I tend to lean towards 500 page fantasies because by the end I feel like the characters are real.

      YOU SAID IT.

      I hope you get to read this book soon, it’s honestly one of my faves of the year!


  8. I agree! The slow pacing of this book was exactly why I loved it. The author took her time building relationships and plot, so that when the story did have it’s climax it felt a lot more believable. Sometimes with fantasy, the authors try to do too much too fast and I sit there with an eyebrow raised because… would things really happen in that quick of a time span? That alone can break me out of whatever spell the book might have put on me and it can be pretty jarring. I enjoyed reading this post and I’m so glad to know that there are more people in the book community who can appreciate a slower paced book.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sometimes with fantasy, the authors try to do too much too fast and I sit there with an eyebrow raised because… would things really happen in that quick of a time span?

      I know what you mean! Especially if there’s romance involved! I need time for feelings to develop! Lol.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to thebookcorps Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s